7 August 2014

The one thing that will drive 90% of your investment performance

If you read enough about investments and growing your wealth, eventually you will come across the claim that “... 90% of investment performance over time is explained by asset allocation...”

If this claim is right, asset allocation is clearly critically important to investors. But what is asset allocation? And how can investors reap its benefits? In this edition of Investor Insight, we consider the various asset classes open to retail investors and how the principle of diversification can ensure that these investors have the right asset allocation strategy to meet their investment objectives.

How asset allocation can help

The age-old challenge of investing is that every investment carries its own, unique type of risk. Some investments might present the prospect of strong returns in the good times, but also the risk of heavy losses if things go badly. Other investments might provide more protection against losses, but do so at the cost of a reduced overall return. Moreover, some types of investments will shine just when other investments are doing badly.

Because all investors are different, each will have his or her own individual objectives, goals and investment time frames. Asset allocation is the process of determining the correct ‘mix’ of investments for each investor by adjusting the percentage of each asset class in an investment portfolio.

A key guiding principle behind most asset allocation strategies is the importance of diversification. In investment, as with most areas of life, it is useful not to have all of one’s eggs in the same basket. Many investors have ignored this principle over the years to their ultimate dismay. That is why Investor Insight has returned to the subject of diversification so frequently over the years.

Ultimately, the ‘golden chalice’ of asset allocation for many investors is identifying investments that have what is known in investment jargon as ‘low correlation’. ‘Correlation’ is simply the extent to which different investments tend to perform well and/or badly at the same time. Investments that exhibit low correlation are those that tend to perform well and/or badly at different points in the cycle. For example, it is often said that ‘vice stocks’ (gaming, tobacco, alcohol and the like) tend to perform well when the broader stock market slumps, as people turn to distractions from the economic misery. Unfortunately, as will be discussed below, finding genuinely uncorrelated investments is more difficult than it seems.

Allocating amongst the asset classes

Classically, investment advisers would speak about three key asset classes: equities, fixed interest and cash. Some would challenge this division and argue for a more expansive list of asset classes, including things like property, commodities and the like. Our discussion today will aim to keep things simple. That means that we will focus on the classical list (making a range of simplified and general comments about it) and will simply note that of course there are many other forms of investment that do not neatly fit within its categories.

Faring well with equities

The mainstream financial media is, of course, obsessed with equities. Why is this the case? Simply because equities are where all the action is. Writers can fill volumes with commentaries on the fluctuations of stocks, sectors and indices. Television and radio commentators can generate hours of content speculating as to why yesterday happened and how (or perhaps even whether) tomorrow will occur. Screens can be filled with rolling tickers filled with symbols and numbers and underneath it all is the ultimate investment dream: perhaps one day we will pick the next ‘big thing’ and get rich overnight.

A more humdrum, less sensationalist approach to the equities asset class would look at it as an investment in the prospects of the businesses that drive a nation’s economy. As an asset class, its performance characteristics over history are well known. It has generated strong returns over the long run, but at the price of significant ‘volatility’ (movements in price). This means that, speaking generally, it is an asset class best suited to those investors with a long term investment horizon. As an illustration of this, consider that the Australian All Ords Index peaked at 6,779 in 2007. As at the day of writing in late July 2014, the All Ords closed at around 5,530. So even an extraordinary seven years later, the All Ords remains over 20% below its peak – before inflation is taken into account.

Within the equities asset class, there are a range of investment strategies that can be adopted. One debate that has raged for many years is between those who like to invest actively (by picking the individual stocks in which they will invest) or passively, via indexing strategies that invest funds according to pre-determined rules in an attempt to replicate the performance of a market index. Proponents of this latter approach emphasise that it minimises the cost of investing and so generally results in a comparable or superior, net performance to active stock picking. Critics maintain that careful active management can produce superior performance outcomes and that investing mechanistically ultimately results in inefficient allocation of capital within an economy.

Fixed on interest?

By contrast with equities, fixed interest receives little attention in the mainstream media. Broadly, this asset class includes investments like bonds (federal government, state government (or ‘semis’) and corporate) and credit/mortgage investments like La Trobe Financial’s offerings. All of these are forms of investment built around a ‘loan’ given by the investor to the borrower. The borrower makes regular interest payments at fixed periods (hence, ‘fixed’ interest) and, eventually, repays the capital.

Again, the performance characteristics of this asset class are well known. Fixed interest targets lower overall returns than equities, but with less risk of losing the initial investment capital. Of course, even within the fixed interest asset class there is a risk/return spectrum. One of the most famous investors of the 1980s was Michael Milken, who made billions as the ‘junk bond king’, specialising in selling ‘high yield’ or sub-investment grade bonds. Whilst he found much support for his own ingenious investment strategies, on 24 April 1990 he pleaded guilty to six counts of securities and tax violations, serving 22 months in prison and paying an extraordinary $1.1 billion as a consequence of the charges and various civil law suits against him. This, of course, is a salutary reminder that all that glitters is not gold.

Whilst classical investment theory holds that the fixed interest asset class has low (or negative) correlation to equities, there is an old adage that in times of financial stress, “all correlations return to one”. This means that all asset classes tend to perform badly together. Whilst not altogether true, building a properly diversified portfolio is not as simple as choosing some investments from the equities asset class and mixing them with some fixed interest investments. It was, after all, in a specialised niche of the bond market that the GFC had its genesis and, ultimately, wreaked such havoc on equities markets across the world.

These days, much of the discussion of the bond market centres on whether it is overvalued. Given that many bonds pay fixed interest rates, low official cash rates tend to make them more valuable and high official cash rates tend to make them less valuable. In the view of some commentators, record low interest rates have resulted in historically high bond prices that will – ultimately – have to fall at some stage.

Can we bank on cash?

The third of the classical asset classes is cash. Its role in a portfolio is straightforward. It is regarded as the least risky (but not risk-free – ask the depositors of Cyprus!) and lowest returning of the asset classes. It is liquid and so provides funds on which investors can live in times of market underperformance.

In the current context, there are two additional points that should be made about cash:

  1. Very few portfolios hold sufficient cash to withstand major market corrections. As we discussed above, the Australian stock market is still over 20% down on its pre-GFC high (before inflation). Very few investors would have held sufficient cash to live for seven years without selling down their share portfolio at potentially significant capital losses. Some would therefore argue that it is important for investors to have some part of their investment portfolio delivering a reliable income stream on which they can live, even when markets are down.

  2. Cash is itself subject to a risk that many investors ignore: inflation risk. Because banks typically pay depositors very low interest rates, returns on cash are often extremely low, even negative, once inflation is taken into account. Over an extended period of time, this can substantially damage wealth. For example, the 20% loss on the value of a portfolio of equities since pre-GFC peaks is matched very closely by a similar ‘purchasing power’ loss on a cash amount that remained nominally the same over the period. For this reason, investors have to be extremely careful about over-exposing their portfolios to cash.

Where does La Trobe Financial fit?

La Trobe Financial’s offerings are fixed interest investments, but are not bonds. They aim to provide investors with a significant degree of capital stability, but at the same time pay a monthly income at a premium to what is available from most cash investments. Importantly, as the graph of the performance of the Pooled Mortgages Option shows, they have a very low correlation to the performance of other key asset classes. This makes them a powerful tool for diversification in any investor’s portfolio.





June Quarter Investor Call Briefing now online!
For those investors who missed our quarterly Investor Call Briefing, it can now be viewed at our website or by clicking the link below.


Whatever market you’re in... hope it’s profitable.

Best regards,
Randal Williams, Chief Wealth Management Officer &
Chris Andrews, Head of Funds Management
La Trobe Financial Asset Management Limited



La Trobe Financial is one of Australia's leading independent credit specialist Fund Managers. Its business includes residential mortgages, commercial mortgages, and investment services operating one of Australia's largest Mortgage Funds under AFSL 222213. It employs over 123 staff and has managed over AUD$10Billion covering over 100,000 investment grade assets since inception in 1952.

Copyright 2013 La Trobe Financial. All rights reserved. No portion of this may be reproduced, copied, or in any way reused without written permission from La Trobe Financial. Disclaimer

The following awards and ratings were given to the Pooled Mortgage Option within the La Trobe Financial Mortgage Fund and may be viewed on our website

Ratings And Awards

Click to share



Videos

Investor Call Briefing Q3 FY2014, Chris Andrews, Head of Funds Management
Updates



 
Newsletter Footer


La Trobe Financial Asset Management Limited ABN: 27 007 332 363 and AFSL No: 222213 is the issuer and manager of the La Trobe Australian Mortgage Fund. It is important for you to read the Product Disclosure Statement for the Fund before you make any investment decision. The PDS is available on our website www.latrobefinancial.com.au or by calling 1800 818 818. You should consider carefully whether or not investing in the Fund is appropriate for you.
- The rates of return from the Fund are not guaranteed and are determined by future revenue of the Fund and may be lower than expected. Investors risk losing some or all of their principal investment. The investment is not a bank deposit.
- Past performance is no guarantee of future performance.
- Withdrawal rights are subject to liquidity and may be delayed or suspended.
- The award and ratings were given to the Pooled Mortgages Option within the La Trobe Australian Mortgage Fund.
- Any rating is only one factor to be taken into account in deciding to invest.

La Trobe Financial Services Pty Limited - Australian Credit Licence Number: 392385
La Trobe Financial Asset Management Limited - Australian Credit Licence Number: 222213

1. Zenith's "recommended" rating indicates that it has high confidence in the manager meeting its objectives. The Zenith Investment Partners ("Zenith") ABN 60 332 047 314 rating referred to in this document is limited to "General Advice" (as defined by section 766B of Corporations Act 2001) and based solely on the assessment of the investment merits of the financial product on this basis. It is not a specific recommendation to purchase, sell or hold the relevant product(s), and Zenith advises that individual investors should seek their own independent financial advice before investing in this product. To view the relevant research information, please visit www.latrobefinancial.com.au The rating is subject to change without notice and Zenith has no obligation to update this document following publication. Zenith usually receives a fee for rating the fund manager and product against accepted criteria considered comprehensive and objective.
2. SQM Research - 4 stars to 4.25 stars - superior, suitable for inclusion on most Approved Product Lists. To view the relevant research information, please visit www.latrobefinancial.com.au This rating will not take into account your, or your clients' objectives, financial situation or needs. It is up to investors to consider whether specific financial products are suitable for your objectives, financial situation or needs. Research houses receive a fee from La Trobe Financial for rating the product.
3. Lipper Leaders Rating Total Return (Score – 5) Lipper Ratings for Total Return reflect funds’ historical return performance relative to peers. The ratings are subject to change every month. The highest 20% of funds in each peer group are named Lipper Leader or a score of 5 for Total Return. Lipper Leader ratings are not intended to predict future results and does not guarantee the accuracy of this information. More information is available at www.lipperweb.com. Thomson Reuters Copyright, All Rights Reserved.
4. Australia Ratings (AFSL 346138) makes every effort to ensure the reliability of the views and rankings expressed in its reports and those published on its websites. Australia Ratings research is based upon information known to it or which was obtained from sources it believed to be reliable and accurate at time of publication. However, like the markets, it is not perfect. This report is prepared for general information only, and as such, the specific needs, investment objectives or financial situation of any particular user have not been taken into consideration. Individuals should therefore discuss, with their financial planner or advisor, the merits of each rating for their own specific circumstances and realise that not all investments will be appropriate for all subscribers. To the extent permitted by law, Australia Ratings and its employees, agents and authorised representatives exclude all liability for any loss or damage (including indirect, special or consequential loss or damage) arising from the use of, or reliance on, any information within the report whether or not caused by any negligent act or omission. If the law prohibits the exclusion of such liability, Australia Ratings hereby limits its liability, to the extent permitted by law, to the resupply of the said information or the cost of the said resupply.